My alternative to sp_WhoIsActive

I use sp_WhoIsActive a lot. I’m extremely grateful for Adam Machanic writing it. It has tons of options that let you specify exactly the information that you need for troubleshooting.

So why did I write a different query to get activity?

There’s some systems where sp_WhoIsActive is too slow. It could be resource related, like CPU, memory, or TempDB pressure, or it could be the DMVs. I’ll talk about that later, I wanted to introduce the idea that there’s situations where you can’t use sp_WhoIsActive.

In that kind of system, you need a lightweight query that can still get the SQL text that the users submitted, along with some similar metrics that you’re used to seeing.

Just three DMVs for this query

I’m just using dm_exec_requests, dm_exec_sessions and dm_exec_input_buffer.

SELECT s.session_id, 
	r.start_time, 
	s.host_name, 
	s.login_name,
	i.event_info,
	r.status,
	s.program_name,
	r.writes,
	r.reads,
	r.logical_reads,
	r.blocking_session_id,
	r.wait_type,
	r.wait_time,
	r.wait_resource
FROM sys.dm_exec_requests as r
JOIN sys.dm_exec_sessions as s
	 on s.session_id = r.session_id
CROSS APPLY sys.dm_exec_input_buffer(s.session_id, r.request_id) as i
WHERE s.session_id != @@SPID
and s.is_user_process = 1 
--Remove the line above if you want to see system processes

Now, I want to show you a side-by-side comparison of the results. The result sets are very similar, on purpose because I tried to get the same information from dm_exec_requests and dm_exec_sessions.

I’m running a workload using SQLQueryStress, another tool from Adam Machanic. Please click the image to view the full image, they’re huge screenshots.

First, the results from sp_WhoIsActive.

Partial column list of sp_WhoIsActive, there’s more columns available

Now the results from my query.

My query, current activity.

Pros and Cons of each query

Let me the first one to say: sp_WhoIsActive is better. For 99.9% of servers, you want to use sp_WhoIsActive. It’s more user-friendly, it’s more accurate, and it has many more DMVs used to gather information.

There’s also the matter of the sql_text vs event_info. In sp_WhoIsActive, you’re seeing the exact snippet of sql text that’s currently running. This is awesome, and much better.

However, I noticed that some of my SQL Servers would take a really long time to access the DMVs for sql text. To reduce that overhead, my query uses event_info, which will include information like “@PostType = 3” which is the literal and entire text that the user submitted to SQL Server.

If you find my query useful

If this post is useful to you, please let me know. I’m very open to suggestions and ideas on how to improve my version!


5 thoughts on “My alternative to sp_WhoIsActive”

  1. Hi Arthur,

    Interesting that SQL text collection is slowing you down. Agreed that sometimes sp_whoisactive gets a bit sluggish — but I certainly had no idea that this was one of the culprits! Have you tried excluding the column using the @output_column_list feature?

    It would be really interesting to get some more info from you on how much slower it is and how much better things get if you take the column out. When things get bogged down I often switch to “lightweight” mode — @get_task_info = 0 — and now you have me wondering whether I should exclude text collection as well. Can you provide some more detail on this situation?

    Thanks!
    Adam

    p.s. I don’t see a subscribe to comments link – mind emailing me?

Comments are closed.

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. more information

The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close